CGI and the Adventure Film

6 11 2008

This year, to much fanfare, Indiana Jones 4 was released. One of things that received immediate backlash was the replacement of traditional optical effects with modern CGI. What’s ironic is that ILM basically invented the widespread use and advancement of modern special effects, including CGI techniques. One would expect computer generated effects to be the natural evolution of what was used in the original Indiana Jones films, and would thus be embraced. Instead, it was met with lukewarm and sometimes bitter feelings. Why?

When I watch the original movies, even though the optical composition and animation is obvious, it has a certain endearing charm. It’s one reason why I prefer old movies to modern; what is real, such as model work, just has a weight, a substance to it. The CGI in Indy 4, for all intents and purposes, is only supposed to be a modern equivalent. I liked the movie, and for the most part, the CGI didn’t bother me. The cinematography did much more harm to the film’s effects, in my opinion. Nevertheless, the CGI lacks the impact and realism of the model work and compositing of the originals, at least to me.





What Defines an Adventure Film?

1 11 2008

In a word: Optimism. There’s something inherently positive about an adventure film’s heart, even one so dark and scary as, say, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. This optimistic humor balances an adventure film’s events. In “The Rocketeer”, a highly underrated movie, some rather intense/frightening events take place at critical points in the film, such as a man being threatened by being pushed onto a hot stove. Ouch. Yet, despite a scene such as this, which could easily take place in a common gangster yarn, the film maintains its positivity, its humor. One of the things that separated the Star Wars Prequels from the Original Trilogy is that same sense of optimism. The Originals were a classic, good vs. evil yarn, while the Prequels struck me as trying to be “The Lord of the Rings in Space”. Going hand in hand with the positive core is the moral concreteness of the stories. Very typically, though not always, morality will be portrayed as distinct, black-and-white, which is epitomized in the cliched Black-hatted Villain (Such as Toht, Lothar, or Darth Vader). The next principle that defines an adventure film is their approach to a dangerous situation, which is what adventure films are all about. Contrast your modern, gritty, action thriller to the scenes in Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. In the typical action movie, gun violence, hand-to-hand combat, and other such conventions are shown in a negative, hostile, anger-drenched manner. This is not wrong, per se, its just the way that genre works. But in an adventure film, even in danger and gunplay, even at the height of intensity and frustration, its about spectacle and watching the hero beat the bad guy while the triumphant theme song plays. In Sky Captain, Joe “Sky Captain” Sullivan is locked inside an explosives filled room with his love interest, Polly. The whole room is about to explode (in a classic cliffhanger), and a typical action film would have already had them swearing and screaming in frustration. Instead, after trying to get out, but discovering they are seemingly doomed, they find themselves comically bickering in a way that lowers the tension for the audience, but not lowering it too much. When they get out at last, and run as the giant fireball threatens to consume them, despite a thrilling and intense sequence, you still get a sense of lightness. This all comes back to the optimism inherent in the film. So, in a word, optimism…





James Bond: An Adventurer, or Not?

1 11 2008

It’s safe to say that the James Bond film series is very close to being considered part of the adventure genre, with its cliffhangers, action set pieces, and sometimes overtly corny villains, but there is something that keeps it safely in the purely action-espianage realm: cynicism and coldness.  The tone of the Bond films is intended to be in keeping with the spy genre; which is to be expected, there really isn’t anything wrong with that. Some of the earlier Bond flicks contained lighter, more serialish action and comedy, balancing out the inherent darkness of the character into something that very closely resembles the Indiana Jones films. I would say that the fairly recent Bond film, “The Living Daylights”, a Timothy Dalton vehicle, came closest, but I haven’t seen all 22 Bond films. In my opinion, despite being generally entertaining and inventive action vehicles, it doesn’t quite fit in the traditional adventure genre. So what’s your opinion?





Welcome to Adventures on Film!

31 10 2008

Let’s start this off with a poll…

Now that you’ve answered that question, I’ll go ahead and introduce myself. I’m James, also known as The Strider, and I’m adventure film fanatic! In my definition, “Adventure” films are free-spirited, action-packed, mysterious, suspenseful, and humourus movies (think Indiana Jones). This blog is devoted to such movies, and I’ll try to bring you the latest news in the Adventure genre. Feel free to comment, and give me some feedback. Polls will be frequent!








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.